In This Strange Labyrinth, by Mary Wroth - 663 Words

Mary Wroth alludes to mythology in her sonnet â€Å"In This Strange Labyrinth† to describe a woman’s confused struggle with love. The speaker of the poem is a woman stuck in a labyrinth, alluding to the original myth of Theseus and the Minotaur. The suggestion that love is not perfect and in fact painful was a revolutionary thing for a woman to write about in the Renaissance. Wroth uses the poem’s title and its relation to the myth, symbolism and poem structure to communicate her message about the tortures of love. In the title â€Å"In This Strange Labyrinth†, the labyrinth is symbolic of love’s maze-like qualities. The speaker describes her predicament by saying, â€Å"In this strange Labyrinth how shall I turn/Ways are on all sides† (1-2). A†¦show more content†¦Evidence of Wroth’s allusion to Adriane and Theseus lies in the lines â€Å" Yet that which most my troubled sense doth move/ Is to leave all, and take the thread of love† (13-14). In the myth, Theseus travels through the maze with Ariadne’s thread as a guide. Though the thread leads Theseus through the labyrinth safely, the speaker struggles to decide whether she is going to take the thread of love and risk the fall. The speaker’s decidedly abusive romance is affected by fire, danger, suspicion, shame, mourning, doubts, and troubled sense. Each path she could possibly take is impeded by something negative. In line three, Wroth says, â€Å"If to the right hand there in love I burn†(3), and refers to love as fire, whether symbolic of passion or literal burning. In the symbolic sense, Wroth is speaking of â€Å"burning† as sexual desire, which for a woman of her time would ultimately lead to the â€Å"shame† mentioned in the sixth line. In the Renaissance, women referred to love as virtuous and romantic. They did not refer to romance as abusive and torturous, making Wroth’s sonnet revolutionary and scandalous. If â€Å"burn† is taken literally, considering Wroth is already comparing love to a strange, intricate made to trap sacrifices as food for a monster, it makes sense that she would also explain it as burning; more or less torture and pain (Abrams 1692). The statement, â€Å"Let me go forward, therein danger is;† (4) explains that her choice to go forward is thwarted by

Trotsky’s Contribution to the Success of the Bolsheviks Up...

Trotsky’s Contribution to the Success of the Bolsheviks Up to 1922 The relatively brief period between approximately 1917 and 1922 was an extremely strenuous, yet glorious and successful time for the Bolshevik Party. With the great help of his right hand man Trotsky, the party leader, Lenin was soon able to deflect support from the current provisional government, and turn heads towards the far more organised and dedicated Bolsheviks. Despite having once been a Menshevik, Trotsky was soon converted to a loyal and dedicated Bolshevik through the greatly influential persuasive power of Lenin, who convinced Trotsky that the time was right for Revolution. Come June 1917, Trotsky was already considered†¦show more content†¦In March 1918, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was signed with Germany, however Russia suffered huge costs, losing one third of its agricultural land, many railways, and a majority of the coalmines. Despite this, Trotsky had done what had been required of him and achieved peace, keeping the Bolsheviks momentarily safe. Meanwhile, Trotsky had been allocated to, and was developing his main contribution to the Bolsheviks success, the Red Army. Under his command, all men aged 18 – 40 were conscripted, and sent to prison camps on refusal. This army, which Trotsky was extremely dedicated to organising, also required officers to lead the men. The solution to this problem was to find former officers of the Tsars army, and send anyone resisting subscription to prison camps. Through this system, Trotsky was left 20 000 officers to command the army of 300 000 men. However, by the end of World War 1, the Bolsheviks were once again faced with major opposition. This time, their opponents consisted of supporters of the Tsar (Tsarists), Socialist Revolutionaries, democrats, landlord, nobles, and many other classes, who all joined together to form the White army. The Bolsheviks also found themselves being attacked by foreign ‘armies of intervention’ from countries such as Britain, who alone contributedShow MoreRelatedTrotskys Contribution to the Success of the Bolsheviks Up to 1922479 Words   |  2 PagesTrotskys Contribution to the Success of the Bolsheviks Up to 1922 1.a) Trotsky’s contribution to the success of the Bolsheviks up to 1922 was mainly through the military; Trotsky was a close friend of Lenin which helped Trotsky get the place at the head of the Military Revolution committee of the Petrograd soviet. Under Trotsky’s leadership, the military revolutionary committee was actually planning to seize power of the government in 1917. Trotsky was placed inRead MoreLeon Trotskys Contribution to the Success of the Bolsheviks Up To 1922895 Words   |  4 PagesLeon Trotskys Contribution to the Success of the Bolsheviks Up To 1922 In this essay I will explain Leon Trotskys contribution to the success of the Bolsheviks. I will consider a number of reasons including his organisation of the revolution, his actions on the 6th - 8th November 1917, public speaking, The Red Army civil war, and the Kronstadt uprising. I will finish with a clear, concise, conclusion. Leon Trotsky was born in 1879 in a remote part of southern UkraineRead MoreThe Life of Leon Trotsky Essay1462 Words   |  6 Pagesreturned to Russia in May 1917. In August 1917, Trotsky joined the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party whose leader was none other than Vladimir Lenin. Trotsky assumed key roles in the events and policies concerning the Bolshevik Government, which included the Bolshevik Revolution, Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, the Civil War and views on Russias economic policies. The Bolshevik party focused on their one aim: overthrow the Provisional Government and replace it with a dictatorshipRead MoreThe Bolshevik Regimes Ability to Defeat Its Opponents by 19221044 Words   |  5 PagesThe Bolshevik Regimes Ability to Defeat Its Opponents by 1922 By the end of 1919, with only a few isolated groups of Anti-Bolsheviks fighting, the Bolshevik regime was evidently winning the Russian Civil War. The reasons which lie behind their ability to defeat all their opponents by 1922 is mainly due to a well-disciplined and equipped army, Lenin’s strong, purposeful leadership and the advantage of the disunity of the Anti-Bolshevik force. The Russian Civil War

Sex and The City and Consumer Culture

Question: Discuss about the Report for Sex And The City And Consumer Culture. Answer: Reading Just say yes: The Romantic-sensation of love in Sex and the City by Beatriz Oria Sex and the city, which is abbreviated as SATC is a famous show which is based on the honesty and individuality of every woman .SATC is not only a feminist show but it also contains love, romanticism, and affection. Some say that SATC is a show which mainly based on the sexual attachments and thoughts of a woman. But according to Oria SATC is not only a sex-related show as the name suggests. It contains a mixture of emotions involved in different stages of a woman's life (Daileader 55-66). In short, SATC can be called a drama which has comedy and romanticism side by side. In the show, the actual emotions of the characters are depicted openly in detail but the skepticism in the matters of heart and love are not depicted in an open format. The article written by Oria argues the point that this shows somewhat cynical view of relation and love some way or the other betrays a deep wish which is to believe in the old fashioned romance. The article also uses Beck and Beck-Gernsheim's sociol ogy theories. With all the comedies it also shows the real problems faced by a woman in the society, how she has to keep her restrained when she is in great need of company. The reel life and real life but separately explained in this drama. It proves the saying of Shakespeare that "Life is not a bed full of roses". Hence, the show points out the reality of life, that is, life is not a fairy tale where the story always ends with a happily ever after tagline(Oria 381-397). Reading Beyond the Backlash: Sex and the City and Three Feminist Struggles by Belinda A. Stillion Southard In reality, SATC is a show where it is shown that how women tackle complex problems of life in their ways. Leading life according to the society is good but being happy the way one likes gives happiness (Stillion Southard 149-167). Here in the show, it depicts how Charlott manages the house, work, and family and also give time to friends. Whereas Carrie plays a role of a woman who is a bit confused about getting Mr. Right in her life. This confusion arises in every individual woman's life all over the world. Miranda plays a role of a lawyer who is very busy and hardly has time for family and the beloved husband. This kind of problem is also a common thing many careerists women. And last but not the least Samantha, a businesswoman who is in her mid-forties but has not allowed her charm of beauty to diminish by age (Arthurs 83-98). She is always into things which are controversial in society. This character was a controversial character in the society which brought up a lot of argument s in the minds of many socialists. But controversies cannot hide the reality of emotions that a woman goes throughout her life. Samantha's lifestyle just hides her loneliness which is filled in her mind. The show left a mark that women also have some wishes and dreams in their life. Their life is not only about looking after their children and family. They also can have secret wishes. It is just like Why should boys have all the fun? type. The character of Samantha is a bold and wild one. There are controversies regarding this character but the question arises as to why a woman cannot lead a life like that of hers. Reading Carrie Bradshaws queer post-feminism: Sex and the City by Jane Gerhard We all know that SATC is narrated by one of its character named Carrie Bradshaw, who is a columnist. She narrates the story on the basis of the writings that she writes in her daily column. So the story of the other three women in the story is also a depiction of her point of view (Gerhard 37-49). Hence it can be said that the show is actually Carrie Bradshaws queer post-feminism. The problems and emotional affections are shown to us in Carries language. It does not only contain women of only one type of age but it contains characters which differ from each other not only by age but the way they lead their life. Their lifestyles and acceptance of lifes issues also differ drastically. It shows the changes of first-wave feminism to second-wave feminism to third-wave feminism. Many of the things in the show also faced social contradictions because of the free discussion of sex so openly. According to Gerhards article, SATC is all about feminism and feministic way of handling life's crit ical situations (Bradshaw 23-37). Whatever happens in their lives but when they all four friends sit together they try to solve it according to themselves. So, SATC is not only a show for the women but the men should also watch it so that they get a vivid idea of the mind of a woman. Carrie diverts our mind towards another sector of thoughts of a woman's life, which only a woman can understand. The men will never understand these thoughts. And in the society, there is a trend the things which are not understood are either declared illogical or foolish or against the law of the society. Carrie narrates the whole story in the perspective of a woman. In the show, everything is shown according to the consent and wishes of a woman. There are many aspects of womens lives which are neglected by the society one way or the other. This show had just tried to highlight the fact that women exist and their wishes too. References Arthurs, Jane. "Sex And The City And Consumer Culture: Remediating Postfeminist Drama". Feminist Media Studies 3.1 (2003): 83-98. Web. Bradshaw, Penny. "The Limits OfBarbauldS Feminism: Reà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ Reading The Rights Of Woman". European Romantic Review 16.1 (2005): 23-37. Web. Daileader, Celia R. "Sex And The City (Comedy): Moll Cutpurse, Carrie Bradshaw, And The Power Of The Feminist (?) Purse". Shakespeare 28 (2011): 55-66. Web. Gerhard, Jane. "Sex And The City". Feminist Media Studies 5.1 (2005): 37-49. Web. Oria, Beatriz. "What's Love Got To Do With It? Sex And The City 'S Comic Perspective On Sex". J Pop Cult 47.2 (2014): 381-397. Web. Stillion Southard, Belinda A. "Beyond The Backlash: Sex And The City And Three Feminist Struggles". Communication Quarterly 56.2 (2008): 149-167. Web.

Romanticism and Classicism free essay sample

Romanticism and Classicism are two different styles of art of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, they are both famous for varied and contradictory definitions. But however, they are also two styles that are not very easy to tell apart at some points. While the Classicists considered of the world as having a rigid and stern structure, the romanticists considered of the world as a place to express their ideas and believe. Romanticism allows the artists to free their unlimited expressions in their works; Classicism artists show a lot of control and restraint in their works. Toward the end of the eighteenth-century, Romanticism emerged as a response to Classicism. Even though this change was in fact gradual, it changed everything from art and philosophy to science and education. So, Romanticism and Classicism have contradictory qualities, but in the artists’ works, they are also hard to tell apart. Romanticism artists and Classicism artists differed their works in their views of nature. We will write a custom essay sample on Romanticism and Classicism or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The Romantic Movement favors subjective, macabre, fantastic, and transcendental subject matter, while the Classical stance favors objectivity and rationality. Romanticism emphasized the individual, the subjective, the irrational, the imaginative, the personal, the spontaneous, the emotional, the visionary, and the transcendental,† (Thompson, E. P. Pg. 108-109). Romanticism is associative; it is usually interesting or powerful because of its associations. Ferdinand Victor Eugene Delacroix (26 April 1798 – 13 August 1863) was a French Romantic artist regarded from the outset of his career as the leader of the French Romantic school . He is a representative of Romantic art. In his work â€Å"The Masscare of Kios† which is done in 1824, he described a world full of death. In this work, Delacroix broke off from the norm because there are too much death in this painting. This work is based on the rebellion of the Greek on the Turkish authorities. At the bottom of this painting, an old woman paralyzed in sorrow and despair; next to this woman, there’s a dead young woman, but her small baby is still alive,so the painting is very depressive at this point. Fear is in everyone’s eyes; they are about to be made an example of â€Å"killed†. There’s a Turk on the horse, putting sword back into its case because two women faces have just been slashed. The horse of the Turk is terrified because of the blood; we can see how terrified this work is. In the background, Delacroix drew a second plain which has also a battle on it. The village in the background is completely under the shadow of fire and death. This painting is very colourful at the time, but some people debated that this painting wasn’t art because it was too terrifying to the audience. This is how Romantic Art expresses its view. In the other hand, Classicism is more based on tradition. Classicists show objective, formal, physical and restraint subject matter. Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres (August 29, 1780 – January 14, 1867) was a French Neoclassical painter, he is also the â€Å"King of Classicism†. In his work â€Å"The vow of Louis xiii†, King Louis offering all his royal power to Mary for giving him a son. Mary and Jesus portrayed as very â€Å"snooty† at the top of the painting. There are some plaques on the wall. â€Å"The virgin mother of God though royal vow Louis xiii†. This painting can now be found in the small town where Ingres was born. So in Ingres’works, the view of nature is different compare to Delacroix’s works. In brief, Romanticism and Classicism have different views of the nature. Romanticists and Classicists differed in their views of the relationship between individual and society. Classicism emphasizes the qualities traditionally associated with ancient Greek and Roman art, that is, reason, objective, and restraint, as opposed to the individuality of expression typical of Romanticism. The work by Ingres which is â€Å"The Sistine Madonna† is also a representative work of him. It’s painted in 1813. Pope Julius is on the left side, looking at Mary and Jesus. On the right side, Saint Barbara is looking down. The clouds are made of babies’ heads. The other famous work by Ingres is â€Å"Napoleon on the Imperial Throne†. In this work, Ingres shows a lot of details,such as the gold tread, and it was criticized at the time that it shows too much details. At that time,Napoleon as the embodiment of the continuity of the French nation. This work is a typical work of Classicism by Ingres, which shows the view of Classicists of the relationship between individual and society. Toward the end of the eighteenth-century, Romanticism emerged as a response to Classicism. Even though this change was in fact gradual, it changed everything from art and philosophy to education and science. Joseph Wright (3 September 1734 29 August 1797), styled Wright of Derby, was an English landscape and portrait painter. He has been acclaimed as the first professional painter to express the spirit of the Industrial Revolution . In Wright’s work â€Å"The Indian Widow†, he described a noble savage who is also an Indian woman grieving with restraint. She’s sitting with a posture that the head is resting is her hand. The tree in the back is a trophy to her dead husband, and the tree is somehow Romantic twisty. The sunset is golden in the sky; the nature is also grieving with the women: Lightning bolts in the sky, the Atlantic Ocean is now very turbulent and the volcano about to erupt. This work contains both Classic and Romantic qualities. In brief, Classicism and Romanticism are not easy to tell apart, they are different in their views of the relationship between individual and society. Romanticists and Classicists differed in their views of the relationship between reason and imagination. Classicism artists express what all know to be true; Romantic artists knows something that we don’t know. Giovanni Battista Piranesi (4 October 1720 9 November 1778) was an Italian artist famous for his etchings of Rome and of fictitious and atmospheric prisons. In Piranesi’s work â€Å"The mole of Hadrian†, he shows a wall which is built to keep out water. Theirs is tour guide at the top; they are all made of stone. There’s also engraving at the bottom, people at the bottom look like ants. The columns are crumbled, with some shadow on it. In Piranesi’s another famous etching work â€Å"The Imaginary Prison†, he shows some romantic qualities as well. There are some instruments of torture in the prison; people are still very tiny like ants. In Piranesi’s works, imaginations are always used, which make his works more Romanticism. Oppositely, Jacques-Louis David (August 30, 1748 – December 29, 1825) was a highly influential French painter in the neoclassical style, considered to be the prominent painter of the era. In his famous work â€Å"Oath of the Horatii†, he shows some classical qualities. The painting shows in the atrium, the three brothers on the left, the Horatii father in the center, and the sister/wives on the right. The three brothers swearing an oath on their swords to their father, to show their loyalty and solidarity with Rome, they are going to do battles versus Alba brothers. They must come back with victory or not return at all. The mothers and sisters are shown clothed in silken garments seemingly melting into tender expressions of sorrow. This is a typical Classic style work by David with some classical qualities. So in brief, Romanticists and Classicists differed in their views of the relationship between reason and imagination. In conclusion, Romanticism and Classicism are two styles with different qualities, but at some points, they are also hard to tell apart. Some artists show in their works both romantic and classic qualities. Romanticism is subjective, macabre, fantastic, and transcendental; Classicism is objective, formal, physical and restraint.